Frank Holmes, journalist
The Democratic Party and Hollywood have been joined at the hip for decades, but the partnership just got murkier—and may drag two of rising Democrats deep into a scandal.
Both are possible 2028—or even 2024—presidential contenders, and Both Apparently, they used public money to market movies to their own captive audience.
California is where the scandal and everything else are at their worst. Gavin Newsom may have profited from taxpayer dollars that funded his wife’s movie career.
Sponsored: 9 drugs linked to Alzheimer’s disease?
New’s wife is Jennifer Siebel Newsom, whom media describe with the gender-neutral term the “First Partner,”The Representation Project is her organization, and has produced at most four movies that promote the Woke ideology.
Her husband and she may have earned a lot of money promoting the sexy movies to students in public schools.
Public schools funded with taxpayer money pay $270 per student to see these movies. School administrators know that the producer’s husband has final control over state funding. Many of them signed up.
“Who’s Watching? 2.6 million students in 5,000 schools,”Open the Books, the monitoring group that broke the news through its tireless research, said the following:
Not only is she subjecting parents in all 50 states — especially California — to her left-wing propaganda, but critics say the movies are also sexually charged.
“Newsom’s films and curricula are saturated with images lifted directly from pornographic websites, their URLs visible onscreen,”Adam Andrzejewski, founder of Open the Books, said it.
Even worse, the movies teach children how to hate and belittle their country. “shame”History of the United States
Sponsored: Biden’s Plan to Confiscate Your Cash
“Minors are exposed to social commentaries about privilege and oppression, and one commentator says Americans need to ‘express shame and sorrow about who we are and what we’ve done’ as a society,” said Andrzejewski.
In an Act II twist worthy of Shakespeare, the movies’ private-sector funders may be using the “First Partner”To funnel illicit campaign contributions to her husband, in return for favors in statehouse
In 2019, The Representation Project cashed checks totaling $350,000 from Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), which has been linked to the most destructive wildfires in state history.
The Newsoms also collect substantial donations from such Big Businesses as AT&T, Comcast, and healthcare giant Kaiser Permanente. The Newsoms also make a lot of money from Planned Parenthood. He makes the most important decisions in the state with the highest population in the union.
Sometimes the money flows the other way — as it did with Pete Buttigieg.
Before Joe Biden named him secretary of transportation, Buttigieg was mayor of South Bend, Indiana, and a rival of Biden’s for the 2020 presidential nomination.
Hollywood created a document about the 2020 campaign titled Mayor PeteAmazon released the book in 2021.
Sponsored: Which address should we mail our book to?
Buttigieg didn’t make any money from the movie, unlike the Newsoms, but having a large audience see the documentary would boost any future campaign, including another run for president.
The Department of Transportation sent out almost a dozen emails to the agency’s 60,000 employees nationwide, bombarding them with news about the movie—including its release date where they could watch it.
“The emails often contained summaries of ‘key” aspects of the linked news stories, such as “Pete Buttigieg hasn’t given up on his dream of being president,” “[on the campaign trail] he also faces [d] blatant homophobia and tough questions about racial politics,” and “the breakthrough of the film is its documentation of his relationship with his husband.” ’” reported the group Protect the Public’s Trust, which broke the story after a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. “It is difficult to discern how these stories have relevance to the work of DOT.”
Those movie summaries probably had as much to do with DOT’s work as Buttigieg’s obsession with Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) had to do with keeping America’s planes traveling smoothly over the holidays.
But DOT’s promotion of Mayor Pete It may not be following the ethical lines; it could just stop by the legal line.
They are responsible for their actions “may run afoul of ethics regulations prohibiting federal employees from using their positions to induce subordinates to provide any benefit, whether it be financial or otherwise, to the employee, his friends, relatives, and others with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity,”According to the non-profit watchdog.
Sponsored: It’s a trick that reveals the signs of lung cancer
How much illegal activity is taking place in the political-entertainment complex? It is impossible to know because of the two Democrats. Only the names of corporations have been officially identified. Donated to Siebel Newsom’s nonprofit because of tax laws; she Refuse to comply to report the names of individuals or corporations who buy the rights to screen her film…just like Hunter Biden refuses to name the people who buy his “artwork.”
These corporations could have business that was pending before Gavin Newsom. What would that mean for his decisions? Is that what has happened to the Bidens with regards to their wholehearted intervention in Ukraine? Or his refusal of shooting down Chinese spycrafts?
The plot would make a good movie — if Hollywood had any interest in exposing the Left.
Frank Holmes, a journalist veteran and outspoken conservative who discusses the news in his weekly column. “On The Holmes Front.”
Check out the complete article here
