One of many arguments you hear so much within the debate over gender ideology, throughout the political spectrum, is that adults ought to be capable to do what they need. That is the supposedly “moderate” place. A number of presidential candidates consider it. Thousands and thousands of Individuals consider it, too. So long as you steer clear of the youngsters, they let you know, then there’s no drawback. The second you hit 18-years-old, do what you need. “Live your truth.”
It’s not exhausting to see why that place is tempting for thus many individuals. Youngsters clearly can’t consent to life-altering procedures, together with genital mutilation and castration. Adults, however, are capable of consent to numerous issues. They will vote, purchase weapons, and serve within the army. So, in the event that they wish to pay a physician to carve up their our bodies, then what’s the large deal? That’s the argument you hear many times.
Nobody actually means it, although. And you understand that as a result of not one of the individuals making that argument would use the identical reasoning to justify, say, lobotomies. In case you walked into a physician’s workplace immediately and requested him to drill a gap in your head and sever your prefrontal cortex in an effort to make you are feeling higher about your life, he’d say no. If he did it, he’d go to jail. No quantity of knowledgeable consent — irrespective of how previous you have been — may presumably justify it. It’s barbaric. Tens of hundreds of individuals’s lives have been ruined by lobotomies. And everybody acknowledges that now. Nobody’s marching in protection of “lobotomy-affirming care.”
So, for those who defend these grotesque “gender-affirming” procedures on adults, you’re not likely saying that adults ought to be capable to do what they need. You’re saying that, sure, individuals can change their intercourse if they need. You’re conceding that these procedures — slicing up a girl’s arm to make a pretend penis, lopping off wholesome breasts, grafting pretend nipples onto sufferers’ chests, et cetera — are medically affordable. And within the absence of any type of statistical knowledge about optimistic long-term outcomes of those surgical procedures, you’re trusting the medical doctors to observe a longtime normal of care. You’re assuming they’re not going to simply mutilate anybody who walks within the door, with out regard for what occurs to those individuals afterwards.
The issue is that your complete trade of “gender affirming care” is a rip-off. We all know that as a result of we simply spent weeks investigating the most important suppliers of so-called “trans healthcare” within the nation. We went undercover at one among them.
What we discovered is that there aren’t any actual “standards of care” governing any of this. To be clear, there are “standards of care” on paper, they usually’re supplied by the transgender activist group WPATH. WPATH’s requirements are utilized by main hospitals on this nation, together with UCLA, UCSF, and Mass Basic, simply to call just a few.
How rigorous are these requirements, precisely? After a 22-minute video name, the most important “trans healthcare” supplier within the nation — rigorously following the WPATH pointers — accredited one among my producers, Gregg Re, for an orchiectomy. Which means testicle removing. Now, 22 minutes can be a file time to get accredited for an orchiectomy for those who had an actual medical motive for it, like testicular most cancers. It’s insane to approve any critical process that rapidly, having simply met a affected person on a video name for the primary time. However that’s what occurred.
We recorded the entire name. At no level did anybody at this well being care supplier, which is named “Plume,” push again in any manner. They didn’t recommend that perhaps, this was a rash plan of action. They didn’t confirm any of the data Gregg supplied, together with his pretend authorized title. All “Plume” did was insist that he pay $150. If Gregg did that, they promised to put in writing him a medically sound letter in assist of life-altering surgical procedure. That letter, below the WPATH requirements, is required for anybody attempting to get transgender surgical procedure in the USA. You need to get one among these letters from a healthcare supplier and current it to your surgeon. And Plume rubber-stamped Gregg’s letter in 22 minutes. And never all of that point was spent discussing the surgical procedure, by the way in which. A few of the dialog was about site visitors, and the climate.
As I write, we’ve simply uploaded footage of the decision on Twitter. You’ll be able to watch it there proper now. On this video name, Gregg assumed the title “Chelsea Bussey.” He didn’t costume up as a girl. He didn’t put on any ladies’s clothes or make-up. He didn’t go to Celebration Metropolis and dye his hair blue. He simply instructed them he recognized as a girl and that he was taking hormones prescribed by his father. Gregg couldn’t even pronounce the title of the surgical procedure he needed, calling it an “orchi-dect-omy.” He claimed at one level that the explanation he needed the surgical procedure is that it could pace up his nonexistent transition, which the Plume nurse mentioned didn’t make any sense from a medical perspective. However none of this raised any purple flags for Plume. The nurse instructed Gregg she needed to put in writing him the strongest letter she may. Watch:
10/ Plume rapidly scheduled Gregg for a video interview anyway. He assumed the identification “Chelsea Bussey.” He didn’t even attempt to pass. He badly mispronounced the name of the surgery he wanted. He made it clear he didn’t know what effect the surgery would have. pic.twitter.com/ph8UbM3i6r
— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) June 7, 2023
11/ Nevertheless, Plume’s nurse practitioner said she wanted to write the most “stable” letter possible to justify surgery. Gregg tells her that he once wrote an essay in school about being a woman, which everyone thought was ridiculous. pic.twitter.com/iY7Ec3Q1wd
— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) June 7, 2023
12/ Gregg also tells Plume’s nurse practitioner that his father has been prescribing him hormones for years. The nurse doesn’t question this in any way. Instead, she says that arrangement is “perfect.” pic.twitter.com/YsB4BEkUpu
— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) June 7, 2023
A couple days after that interview, as we documented on Twitter, Plume sent Gregg a letter diagnosing him with significant and ongoing gender dysphoria. Therefore, Plume said, he was an “appropriate candidate for Orchiectomy.” According to Plume, testicle removal would help Gregg make “significant progress” in alleviating his dysphoria. Even after Gregg followed up with text messages to Plume, explaining that he doesn’t have dysphoria, they didn’t retract or amend that letter in any way.
13/ Three days later, Plume sent this letter to “Chelsea Bussey” – who doesn’t exist — saying he was experiencing “significant, ongoing gender dysphoria.” The letter strongly recommended “Chelsea” for testicle removal. pic.twitter.com/WzIMsjygS6
— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) June 7, 2023
There’s no excuse for that. Plume had multiple opportunities to tell the truth in their letter, and they chose not to. In his intake form, Gregg indicated he didn’t have dysphoria for 6 months or more. That means, under the current version of the DSM, he never should have been diagnosed with it in the first place. But Plume never once asked Gregg about this in his video interview. Instead they just said he had dysphoria in his letter, which they intended to be used by a surgeon who would then carve up Gregg’s testicles.
Why didn’t Plume amend the letter once they were made aware that Gregg didn’t have dysphoria? As Plume’s nurse explained, “in order for the surgery to be paid for,” the diagnosis would need to remain. In other words, insurance companies won’t pay for the operation unless the letter contains a diagnosis of gender dysphoria. That’s why Plume uses templates that include the gender dysphoria diagnostic code. It appears that they plug whatever information patients feed them into the template, whether or not those patients actually have the diagnosis. The templates are provided by WPATH, by the way — Plume admitted that to us.
It’s not hard to conclude that this operation is fraudulent, but what do insurers think of it? What’s Aetna and United Healthcare’s position on paying for surgeries based on cooked-up diagnostic codes? How about Cigna? We understand those insurance companies work directly with Plume. What about David Sacks, whose venture capital firm is one of many that’s funding Plume? What are his thoughts on this? Is he aware this is happening? Those are good questions.
But the problem is much bigger than Plume. They’re far from the only ones doing this.
Folx, for example, is a major competitor of Plume. They’re in almost every state in the country. They’re also extremely well-funded by venture capitalists. Folx, like Plume, also sells letters that authorize surgeries under the WPATH guidelines. On their website, Folx admits, “It’s quite possible the information in a letter may not be specific to you. For example, they may use a gender dysphoria diagnosis, but you really do not have dysphoria… You may not fit this diagnostic code exactly, but in some cases, the code is needed in order for insurers to pay for the surgery.” We reached out to Folx to ask about this. They confirmed that a “diagnosis” — in scare quotes — was necessary in order for insurance companies to pay out.
Again, that’s probably news to the insurance companies. But the bigger issue, of course, is what’s happening to the patients who are mutilated as part of this process. It’s not just Plume and Folx who are authorizing surgeries like this. There’s a whole network of doctors who crank out these letters. It’s called the Gender Affirmative Letter Access Project, or G.A.L.A.P.
Think of the lives these doctors and these companies are destroying for profit. If they’ll approve Gregg for castration, they’ll approve anyone. Many of the luminaries in the field will admit that, by the way. On Twitter, we highlighted this training session from the Juniper Center, which is one of the largest gender therapy practices in the Chicago land area. Watch as the licensed clinical social worker, named Ari Groner, explains that she’ll rubber-stamp whatever letter patients want. She says she’ll even authorize a suicidal patient for surgery, because she’s not a “gatekeeper.” In fact, Groner says that if her patient is suicidal, that would just make the case for surgery even stronger. Listen to this:
2/ First, some background. Ari Groner is a licensed clinical social worker who educates doctors on “trans healthcare.” At a recent training session for the Juniper Center, Groner explained that she writes whatever letters her patients want, because she’s not a “gatekeeper.” pic.twitter.com/8CVUWiYetY
— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) June 7, 2023
If you’re defending “gender affirming care” for adults, this is what you’re supporting. You’re saying it’s reasonable for medical professionals to listen to a suicidal patient, who isn’t thinking clearly, and approve them for surgical castration within minutes. You’re saying there should be no barriers to this kind of mutilation, whatsoever. At that point, why not bring back lobotomies? What’s the serious, principled argument against it?
No serious person can defend this industry. It’s completely corrupted, at every level. It’s not just targeting children, although it’s certainly doing that as well. The underlying claims and promises of the entire “gender affirmation” industry are lies, and the lies are propped up by even more lies. And we’ll have much more on WPATH soon, and how they became so prominent in this field. It’s a truly disturbing story. Their supposedly rigorous standards of care are purpose-built to be manipulated, as we’ve now revealed.
The practical effect of these WPATH standards isn’t to protect patients. Instead, the WPATH standards protect doctors who butcher their patients. These doctors understand that they need to follow some “standard of care,” or else they’ll eventually get sued into the ground for malpractice by the patients they’re disfiguring. So medical providers point to the WPATH standards, and say, “look — we followed those standards. These gruesome surgeries are in fact legitimate medical care!”
Now it’s time to put an end to this. Insurance companies should cut off these providers. Investors should stop funding this barbarism. And at the political level, we need laws so that any doctor who mutilates patients, or lies to insurance companies, goes to prison — regardless of the patients’ age. Florida recently passed a law outlawing, among other things, “trans telehealth” services. They require in-person visits for most of these procedures. That’s a start — which is why the media and the trans activists are furious about it. They’re probably going to sue to block that portion of the law, just like they blocked the part of the law outlawing child castration yesterday.
But once people see the truth about what’s happening, the radical gender activists won’t win that fight. That’s why we published our investigation today. The truth is obvious and undeniable. Now that the “standards of care” have been exposed for what they are, there’s nothing to stop a flood of lawsuits that could shut down these butchers. We saw it in the U.K. with Tavistock. If something like that happens here, it could save tens of thousands of lives.
This investigation is just one part of what we have planned for Pride Month. We’re going to expose the full extent of the depravity that you’re told to believe is “medically legitimate.” We’re going to show you the truth behind all the euphemisms. We’re going to reveal how exactly activists have managed to hijack the medical profession so they can mutilate patients for profit.
That is just the start.
Learn the complete article here
