Hunter Biden filed a countersuit Friday towards the Delaware laptop repairman, John Paul Mac Isaac, who claimed to have labored on Hunter’s private laptop method again in 2019. The president’s latchkey son is alleging that Mac Isaac illegally obtained and distributed his “electronically stored data,” thereby invading his privateness.
But, his attorneys insist that the authorized motion on no account needs to be taken as proof that the “laptop from hell” is actual.
“This is not an admission by Mr. Biden that Mac Isaac (or others) in fact possessed any particular laptop containing electronically stored data belonging to Mr. Biden,” the primary footnote within the 42-page countersuit filed in Delaware states. “Rather, Mr. Biden simply acknowledges that at some point, Mac Isaac obtained electronically stored data, some of which belonged to Mr. Biden.”
Oddly sufficient, regardless of not admitting that Hunter’s laptop computer existed, they declare that if it did exist, Mac Isaac broke the regulation by accessing the info as a substitute of taking measures to correctly safe it.
As readers nicely know, Mac Isaac has claimed that Hunter dropped off his laptop computer and by no means returned. Mac Isaac has additionally claimed that Biden signed a contract stating that any gear left after 90 days would grow to be Mac Isaac’s possession.
Hunter’s lawyer denies that and argues that Delaware state regulation would overrule such an settlement. Moreover, they declare that the “Repair Authorization Form” nonetheless wouldn’t give Mac Isaac entry to any saved private knowledge on a laptop computer that they received’t admit exists.
“At no time did Mr. Biden grant Mac Isaac any permission to access, review, copy, or disseminate for his own purposes any electronically stored data that ever was created or received or maintained by Mr. Biden (regardless of how Mac Isaac came into possession of such material),” the countersuit claims. (emphasis added)
So how did Mac Isaac get Hunter’s private knowledge? His attorneys don’t know how. They’ll’t even say which private knowledge they’re speaking about.
“In or before April 2019, Counterclaim Defendant Mac Isaac, by whatever means, came into possession of certain electronically stored data, at least some of which belonged to Counterclaim Plaintiff Biden,” his attorneys wrote. (emphasis added)
Now, The Every day Wire viewers is aware of that conservative information shops have verified that the laptop computer belongs to Hunter. It seems that The New York Submit, the primary to report this bombshell story that obtained them censored on Twitter in 2020, has been absolutely vindicated.
After the 2020 election, as soon as Biden was inaugurated and the story may do much less injury to the Democratic Get together, legacy media shops lastly started wanting into whether or not they exist or not. Politico, The New York Instances, and The Washington Submit all confirmed it was Hunter’s laptop computer. Right here’s how Hunter’s attorneys responded to that reporting:
Mr. Biden denies that any Politico story confirmed the validity of the New York Submit exposé.
Mr. Biden denies that any New York Instances story confirmed the validity of the New York Submit exposé.
Mr. Biden denies that any Washington Submit story confirmed the validity of the New York Submit exposé.
We already know that Hunter requested that his dad’s Division of Justice examine Mac Isaac and others related to the story. Since that didn’t work, it seems Hunter shouldn’t be content material to throw up a lawsuit, chillingly accuse Mac Isaac of consorting with “political enemies of Joseph Biden,” and neither affirm nor deny the existence of mentioned laptop computer.
As lawyer Jonathan Turley put it, it’s a “rather a curious countersuit.”
…That is moderately a curious countersuit. Hunter left his his laptop with a 3rd social gathering, refused repeated request to retrieve them, and agreed that he would lose all declare to the information if deserted. Now, years later, he’s objecting vehemently that his privateness was not protected.
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) March 17, 2023
The views expressed on this piece are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially signify these of The Every day Wire.
Learn the complete article here