OPINION: This text might comprise commentary which displays the creator’s opinion.
The lawyer for grownup film star Stormy Daniels stated that his consumer wouldn’t essentially be happy if former President Donald Trump was indicted. He made the remark when he spoke to CNN host Anderson Cooper on Thursday concerning the case that Manhattan District Lawyer Alvin Bragg has earlier than a grand jury,” Mediaite reported.
“As you know, the former president denies any wrongdoing. He says this was an extortion plot. Some of his political allies have downplayed it as a mere personal transaction,” the host stated.
“Is there any doubt, in your view, that the payment was designed to help protect his campaign?” he stated.
“Well, I think that reasonable people, knowing the facts and the timing, would reach that conclusion. I see no reason to believe otherwise,” lawyer Clark Brewster stated.
“What does Ms. Daniels want to see happen here? Would she be pleased if the former president was indeed indicted?” the host stated.
“Well, I don’t know about pleased,” the lawyer stated.
“I’ll inform you that, in my interactions along with her — I’ve represented her now since March of 2019 — she’s all the time been very easy and truth-telling. And I believe, greater than something, she wishes that the reality be advised and located by (AUDIO GAP) and the denials and the accusations of dishonesty stop.
“So, I think she’s more interested in the resolution of this being determined upon the truth, rather than anything else,” he stated.
“As you know, the timing of this investigation has been called into question, given that it centers around a payment from back in 2016,” the CNN host stated.
“Did Ms. Daniels think this was all behind her, I mean, not just the legal saga, but having to deal with the former president’s insults, things like that?” he stated.
“Well, she’s been through quite a lot, as your station has reported,” the lawyer stated.
“I imply, she’s been by means of the Avenatti chronicles, the problems related to a defamation lawsuit in California, in addition to the nondisclosure litigation on the market. However, greater than the rest, I imply, she doesn’t have any management over how that is prosecuted or delivered to a jury in any approach.
“She simply is there and willing to support and tell the truth, whichever way it decides to go,” he stated.
“If the former president is, in fact, indicted, and she was called to be a witness, would she be prepared to testify?” the host stated.
“Yes. She’s made that very clear,” the lawyer stated.
“She would be willing to testify, and she would support her testimony with documented — documents and evidence and corroboration with witnesses, if necessary,” he stated.
“I also know you provided the prosecution with communications between the former president’s attorney in this matter, Joe Tacopina, and Stormy Daniels from back in 2018,” the host stated.
“Can you explain, in kind of layman’s terms, what those communications were about, how they may possibly impact any court proceeding?” he stated.
“Yes. So, Mr. Tacopina (AUDIO GAP) that he had never met Ms. Daniels and didn’t have any attorney-client relationship. In fact, in February 2018, there was a fair amount of exchange between Ms. Daniels and Mr. Tacopina’s firm. She had a number of not only conversations but extensive e-mails, outlining details of this transaction involving the former president, as well as witnesses and a chronology and what took place,” the lawyer stated.
“That series of written exchanges led to a direct conversation, a lengthy conference with Mr. Tacopina’s firm. So, I would say that he’s at least conflicted, to a point where he couldn’t represent opposition on that issue against her,” he stated.
However as each Daniels and her lawyer insist that an affair occurred between her and the previous president, her personal phrases have come again to chew her.
Within the letter from 2018, shared by Trump on his TruthSocial account on Thursday, Daniels denies any affair ever occurred between the 2.
“Over the past few weeks I have been asked countless times to comment on reports of an alleged sexual relationship I had with Donald Trump many, many, many years ago,” Daniels stated.
“The fact of the matter is that each party to this alleged affair denied its existence in 2006, 2011, 2016, 2017, and now again in 2018. I am not denying this affair because I was paid ‘hush money’ as has been reported in overseas-owned tabloids. I am denying this affair because it never happened,” she stated.
“I will have no further comment on this matter,” she stated.
Learn the complete article here