Congressman Adam Schiff insisted on Sunday that the January sixth Committee had “evidence” of former President Donald Trump’s involvement in an effort to over flip the outcomes of the 2020 election, however refused to disclose it as a result of he didn’t need to “get ahead of the hearing.”
Schiff joined anchor Dana Bash on CNN’s “State of the Union” to debate the continuing public committee hearings – and Bash pressed Schiff a number of occasions on his claims that Trump had been concerned in what occurred.
Rep. Adam Schiff tells Dana Bash that he “has evidence” of Trump’s involvement on January sixth, however he cannot reveal it as a result of he does not “want to get ahead of the hearing.” pic.twitter.com/mAcVL6LW5R
— Virginia Kruta (@VAKruta) June 19, 2022
“Your hearing will include evidence about Trump electors in battleground states who submitted fake Electoral College ballots, even though Trump lost these states we’re talking about,” Bash started. “We have already heard campaign officials, Trump campaign officials were involved in that. Do you have evidence that the former president himself was involved?”
“Yes. We’ll show evidence of the president’s involvement in this scheme,” Schiff replied. “We’ll also, again, show evidence about what his own lawyers came to think about this scheme. And we’ll show courageous state officials who stood up and said they wouldn’t go along with this plan to either call legislatures back into session or decertify the results for Joe Biden.”
Schiff went on to assert that the system had solely “held” as a result of state and native officers had “upheld their oath to the Constitution” and refused to associate with Trump.
“Just to be clear, you said you have evidence that the then president was involved in putting a fake slate of electors out there,” Bash pushed again. “Do you have evidence that he directed it?”
“You know, I don’t want to get ahead of our hearing,” Schiff replied. “We’ll show during a hearing what the president’s role was in trying to get states to name alternate slates of electors, how that scheme depended initially on hopes that the legislatures would reconvene and bless it and he pressed forward with it anyway.”
“Will we see he directed it?” Bash interrupted, repeating the query as soon as Schiff completed his thought. “Will we see that he directed it?”
“I don’t want to get ahead of the role,” Schiff stated once more.
Schiff took the identical place when he accused former President Trump of colluding with Russia within the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election — usually claiming that he had proof of collusion however by no means revealing it publicly.
Learn the complete article here